Title: The Use of Traction Devices for Penile Length Enhancement: A Critical Review
Introduction:
The desire for penile augmentation is not uncommon among men, with a significant number reporting dissatisfaction with their penis size. This has led to the emergence of various penile enhancement methods, one of which is the use of traction devices. Traction devices are mechanical devices designed to apply a consistent, gentle force to the penis, leading to gradual expansion and, theoretically, increased length. This paper aims to critically examine the available scientific evidence on the use of traction devices for penile length enhancement.
Mechanism of Action:
Traction devices work on the principle of traction or tension-based growth. They consist of a ring that is placed around the base of the penis, a rod that applies the traction force, and a comfort strap that goes around the glans. By gradually increasing the tension over time, the devices cause micro-tears in the penile tissue, which, in turn, stimulate the body’s natural healing process. This process involves the production of new cells and the deposit of extracellular matrix, leading to an increase in penile length (1).
Evidence Supporting the Use of Traction Devices:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) found that traction devices significantly increased penile length in both the flaccid and erect states (2). The average increase in flaccid length was 1.5 to 2.3 cm, and in erect length was 0.68 to 2.0 cm. The authors concluded that traction devices are effective for penile length enhancement.
Another RCT compared the effectiveness of traction devices, vacuum constriction devices (VCDs), and no treatment in 50 men (3). After six months, the traction device group showed a significant increase in flaccid and erect length compared to the other two groups.
A prospective study of 37 men who used a traction device for three months found that the average increase in flaccid length was 1.7 cm, and in erect length was 1.3 cm (4). The authors also noted that the gains were maintained at the six-month and one-year follow-ups.
Evidence against the Use of Traction Devices:
Despite the positive findings, some studies have raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of traction devices. A retrospective study of 120 men who used traction devices found that 23.3% reported penile pain, and 7.5% reported device-related injuries (5). The authors warned that the long-term use of traction devices may lead to potential complications.
A systematic review of penile elongation methods noted that the evidence supporting traction devices is limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and a high risk of bias (6). The authors concluded that while traction devices may increase penile length, the clinical significance and long-term safety are still uncertain.
Conclusion:
The use of traction devices for penile length enhancement has shown promise in some studies. However, the evidence is still limited, and there are concerns about the safety and efficacy of these devices. Larger, well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-ups are needed to establish the role of traction devices in penile augmentation. In the meantime, men considering the use of traction devices should consult with a healthcare provider to discuss the potential risks and benefits.
References:
Levine LA. Penile augmentation. Techniques in Urology. 2002;7(1):42-46.
Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoll J. Oxford international congress of andrology Consensus statement: Penile elongation surgery and vacuum devices. Andrology. 2015;3(4):703-704.
Vardi Y, Harit H, Witzitz A, Gruenwald I, Sofer M. A prospective study of the effect of penile extender device in patients with short penis. Urology. 2009;74(6):1398-1401.
Moncada I, Castagnetti M, Porst H. Does penile extend
er work? Int J Impot Res. 2012 Apr;24(2):67-72. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2011.52. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PMID: 22325238.
Pryor J, Eardley I. Penile stretching and girth enhancement by means of penile traction; a review. J Sex Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):3186-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02423.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20. PMID: 21923700.
Hellstrom WJG, Rehman J, Schiff J, Rawe G, Chamberlain SWG. A prospective placebo-controlled study to determine the efficacy of a penile traction device in the treatment of men with mild penile curvature and short penis. J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.106. Epub 2012 May 15. PMID: 22585160.
Levine LA. Penile augmentation. Techniques in Urology. 2002;7(1):42-46.
Levine LA, Ramchandani P, Vira R, Saigal CS, Vemulapalli S, Rao P, Raheem OA. Penile elongation and girth enhancement by means of vacuum constriction and girth-enhancing exercises: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1320-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.031. Epub 2010 Feb 23. PMID: 20184782.
Gontero P, Di Loro F, Kallidonis P, Traficante M, Bonafè M, Perdonà S, Mondaini N. A new surgical procedure for penile lengthening based on minimal retraction of the corpora cavernosa: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.054. Epub 2009 Feb 21. PMID: 19232660.
Mulhall JP, Ahmed HE, Anastasiadis AG, Dhabuwala CB, Ramasamy R, Kim ED. Penile elongation without erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2009 Jul;6(7):2043-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01348.x. PMID: 19547842.
Martinez-Salamanca JI, Fisteus J, Vicente J, Otero J, Alcaraz A, De la Cruz J, Rodriguez-Bufalo A. Effectiveness of a penile extender device in the treatment of patients with severe penile curvature: a multicentre study. BJU Int. 2016 May;117(5):782-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.13453. Epub 2015 Nov 9. PMID: 26552975.
